- Нас покидают...
- Guide to photo reports from exhibitions
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель”, серебро, эмаль.
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель” , оклад,эмаль.
- ASSESSMENT ON Internet (Information database for 5000 artists)
- Still Life Flowers Eugene Lang
- Автопортрет художника. 1930-е.г. Атрибуция.
- Положение во гроб Иисуса Христа оценка
- Bronze. E.Lancere.
- collages on the theme of the war in Ukraine
Art and technology. Market ArtTech-стартапов. Part 2
ARTinvestment.RU 19 марта 2020
The most common mistakes made ArtTech-стартапами during the launch phase
In the first of the material, we reviewed the main figures with whom the young company at the intersection of art and technology came to the beginning of 2020. Today we will talk about the seven major mistakes in actions ArtTech-стартапов, which we have summarized on the basis of personal communication with both sides of the market @founders mdas projects and investors — in the last two years:
1. Definition of a false problem
First, in chronological order, the error startup founders — is blind faith in the idea. Essential clause: faith — is motivation and a necessity of life, but blindness — companion of ignorance that belies the success of the project at the launch stage. If the Decking, head of the Supervisory Board of TEFAF and the Creator of ArtTech-стартапа Artory, drew attention to another conference Christie's Art Tech Summit in 2018: "most of the startups focused on his proposal, ignoring the demand of the art market. The reason — they don't know him real problems." Unfortunately, the majority of educational institutions associated with art-бизнесом focus on the outside market, paying little attention to the insider, and invited speakers from among the functionaries told us with a smile on their own progress. Also note that most of the founders of the ArtTech-стартапов come to art from other areas — financial, legal or technological, in the best case, knowing about the mechanisms of art-рынка from books Donald Thompson or Philip hook. The four questions the author should ask themselves from the beginning:
• whether There is in fact a problem that is solved by my proposal?
• whether my suggestion will solve the existing problem in the art market?
• How the art market without me so far (how to solve this problem today without my unique technology)?
• If I have competitors, and if not — why (more on this below)?
one could hear from startup founders the following argument: "At the time of the advent of the iPhone did not solve any problem, it has created a market demand from scratch. People just didn't know what they're missing days to drive around the screen with your finger." Those who claim such, I do not know the following market rules: the need from scratch can create only the market leader — e.g., Apple, Google or Amazon. Such companies are called strategists, and talk about them in the following paragraphs. In relation to the art market strategists are Sotheby's, Christie's, Art Basel, TEFAF, Larry Gagosian, and other companies and persons.
2. Incorrectly selected market
As we recall from the previous article, ArtTech-стартапы introduced after 2017, are divided into four categories in this percentage: transactions (Internet-аукционы, online-галереи) — 64 %, information (databases, indexes) — 12 %, research (online-образование, machine learning) — 12 %, the management of collections (logistics, storage, insurance) — 12 %. In other words, most of the ideas of young companies focused on the sale of art in any form. Accordingly, their total available market now stands at $64.1 billion, of which only 42% of the transactions are public (officially confirmed). From the perspective of the institutional investor,sixty-four billion — is a very small market, and 2/3 of companies in the sphere of technology in the arts who are trying to get — is either ignorant or crazy. At the same time, the remaining 1/3 of startups that focus on more "rough" work of art market, have a potentially available market of about $3 trillion — the value of all art in private hands, which is constantly being researched, stored, insured, and only occasionally sold. Thus, properly selected niche market will allow start-UPS not only do not bunch up in one area, but also to have a more serious market performance in dealing with investor.
3. The asceticism of the startup founders
Active communication in a professional environment — the success of a startup. Fair projects, thematic conferences, professional competitions and informal community — visiting such events should be part of the busy schedule of Creator of a young company. It is a mistake to believe that excessive exchange of information will lead to theft of your ideas. In-первых if your experience will take, so you were right. In-вторых, you can rest assured at the time of the emergence of new ideas in your head like thoughts of ten goals across the world. And who is-то usually in your development for the year ahead of you. The finish comes just a few companies that will share new market — try to be among them! Meantime, look for those whose startups similar to yours, make friends and learn their negative experience. But if you find that your startup is truly unique, first of all ask ourselves: do we need this idea to market, if it has no competitors? And keep the answer ready the next time this question you will hear from the investor.
4. The study of consumers and development of consumer network
Many startups confuse the process of studying the consumer and the consumer network. Both are needed for founders when the idea is framed in a presentation and the time comes to test it on the audience. Usually the idea first, represent the available audience — family, friends, colleagues, at least — from the professional community. Reviews of loved ones, usually positive, and the founders often leave it at that, turning to search the first money. But even in communicating with your future audience a simple test of the idea in the "question —, the answer is" not enough. Explain with an example: you create a system of remote management of the collection, operating on a subscription, and interviewed about 300 collectors. 70 % of them supported your idea and said that will use this service in the future. It's good, but you still only learn the consumer. Now try to take them with a prepayment of the annual subscription, even before the creation of the product, — for example, with a 50% discount. You will immediately see how your 70 % collectors away: on average you will receive the money from 10 to 15% of the respondents. This will be your actual users. But now, realizing what part of the audience shifts from admiration to parting with money, you can more properly assess future income (and marketing costs).
5. Useless prototype
Received the first money, a tech startup usually directs them to the prototype —trial software product that can test the audience and at the same time show the investor the feasibility of further investments. The main mistake that startups at this stage, — is an attempt to accommodate the prototype all the functionality of the future project. The resulting product resembles a frozen long-term construction with protruding valves: expensive to build, and to understand even more. The other extreme — as a prototype to hone to perfection what-либо part of a startup that has no practical use. There is a good rule: if your final product — is a luxury car, its prototype must be perfectly balanced wheel with rhinestones, and a skateboard. Skateboarding, unlike the wheel travels, and the wheel to roll manually. In the first variant the investor is more likely to believe that you understand the laws of mechanics and team work and give the money for the car. In the second — at best buy your wheel and send everyone home.
6. The focus on the investor, not the strategist
in Simple words: investor — person or company that invests money in expectation of returns (in the best case — taking into account profit in the optimal — savings adjusted for inflation). Strategist — largest company among the market leaders, which in case of your interest in your startup buys it completely, or to include its technology in its core business or to remove from the market (because he has a subsidiary company-конкурент). In recent years, policymakers are increasingly buying startups from-за of a cohesive team: it is given to the development of a new project, and the primary business-идею startup utilized. Historically for any startup the best business exit — is to be purchased strategist. However, most startups, the first thing is to investors, whose number is multiplying every investment round (the stage of attraction money). As a result, by the time the strategist was supposed to pay attention to a startup company is a complicated equity structure with many owners. When buying such a startup, as a rule, the profit of its founders is close to zero: all go to repay obligations issued to the investors at the initial stage when the first real money shares in the company were given very lightly. More competent approach — initially "reach out" to strategists and find out how they are interested in your business-идея and will they be ready to buy it, after several years of testing in the market. If the answer is Yes, then you can look for investors, to talk about the interest of the strategist and to rationally structure their equity participation. Risks of ideas being stolen is minimal: conditional Sotheby's cheaper later buy you with cones filled at the expense of your time and money than to create their own Department. It is proved time and , money strategists.
7. Errors in financial models
Suppose you — ArtTech-стартап who have successfully completed all the listed items: you have a correct niche got the first customers, has created around itself an ecosystem of followers, partners and competitors were blessed with a strategist at the start and attracted investment capital. Analysts from the investor've looked at your business-план and gave the "green light" money tranches and the actual beginning of your work. Right now might be nuances that you missed and at the same time not bother representatives of the investor. Analysts are looking at underlying things: the channels of the sales funnel to attract customers, UNIT-экономику, etc. If all this is consistent with the model the financial model, they verify their purchases project. But the inner workings of the art market, they don't know they are obliged to initially know you. Here is an example: you create "art-шазам", application for recognition of paintings in museums, and attract $5 million investment. Your sort of financial model stable, but you start to create a product and find out: it turns out, in order to sign partnership contracts with all art museums of the world (about 15 thousand), your lawyer according to the norms of the local Union will need to work a little more than 5 thousand working days, or 23 years. You frantically begin to hire a third-party art-юристов, which charge an average of $500 per hour, — as a result, your estimates will increase by $22.5 million And this is only the beginning of the surprises waiting for the founders ArtTech-стартапов, which did not take into account features of the market.
About the statistics of survival ArtTech-стартапов, optimistic figures and projections for the young companies at the intersection of art and technology we will discuss in the final part of the material.
https://artinvestment.ru/en/invest/analytics/20200319_Technologies_Startups_2.html
https://artinvestment.ru/invest/analytics/20200319_Technologies_Startups_2.html
When quoting reference to the https://artinvestment.ru without fail
Attention! All materials of the site and database of auction results ARTinvestment.RU, including illustrated reference information about the works sold at auctions, are intended for use exclusively for informational, scientific, educational and cultural purposes in accordance with Art. 1274 of the Civil Code. Use for commercial purposes or in violation of the rules established by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is not allowed. ARTinvestment.RU is not responsible for the content of materials submitted by third parties. In case of violation of the rights of third parties, the site administration reserves the right to remove them from the site and from the database on the basis of an application from an authorized body.
- 16.08.2022 Расследование ФБР подрывает репутацию Художественного музея Орландо Отменены три выставки, из собрания отозваны отдельные работы
- 14.08.2020 Face mask for $1.5 million In this sum cost the unnamed "billionaire from Shanghai" ordering a mask of gold and diamonds from the jewelry company Yvel
- 14.08.2020 A special contract for buyers of art of authors of African descent For fight against speculators, Christie's has developed a list of conditions of purchase
- 13.08.2020 Cultural institution in the U.S. last year spent $7.9 billion This year a repeat result is not obtained – loss of art-индустрии the United States already amounted to $150 billion And this is not the final figure
- 13.08.2020 Biography Yayoi Kusama will be released as a graphic novel With the history of one of the most successful contemporary artists in the form of a comic book will be available from 15 September 2020
- 03.08.2018 Торги «Антиквариума» 28 июля. Краткие итоги Наторговали на 3,6 миллиона рублей — 131 % от эстимейта. Одним из топ-лотов стала работа Владимира Немухина, проданная за 240 тысяч
- 25.07.2018 Очередной аукцион #всёпорублю в «Литфонде» принес почти 4,5 млн.руб. Топ-лотом стала икона «Богоматерь Владимирская» — 600 тыс. руб.
- 24.07.2018 «Русская Эмаль» торжественно закрывает сезон и уходит в отпуск На завершающих торгах 14 июля «Русская эмаль» порадовала участников Кандинским, целой коллекцией нэцкэ и произведениями Пыжовой
- 16.07.2018 Краткие итоги сороковых живописных торгов «Кабинета» Аукционный дом «Кабинет» проводит последние торги сезона и уходит в отпуск до осени, вслед за своими игроками
- 03.07.2018 Коротко о главном: итоги аукциона 28 июня в «Литфонде» Рейтинг возглавляют классики русской литературы, а сказочники продолжают удивлять
- 12.08.2020 Literature: Piroska Dossey. Sold! The book is about the phenomenon of pricing, the original title of which was ahead of its time in a decade
- 07.08.2020 Movies: "the Cool school" The emergence of abstract expressionism on the West coast of the United States the voice of the Big Lebowski
- 06.08.2020 Cross-trades in the summer of 2020. ArtTactic Report Analysis of auction sales of a new format with the participation of the old masters
- 04.08.2020 Opened 27-й auction "twenty-first century. Contemporary Russian art" The catalogue contains artworks of Seeds Agroskin, Alexei Vaulin, Dima Goryachkin, Dasha Delone, Anna Laurel, Denis Mikhailov, Andrei Munz, Arman Sirunian, Kathy-Анны Taguchi and Tatiana Yang
- 31.07.2020 10 most unusual ArtTech-стартапов 2020. Part 1 AI talks about young companies whose ideas have become especially popular with the onset of the quarantine
- 07.03.2023 Неизвестный известный Серж Иванов (1893–1983) История происхождения ранних картин С.П.Иванова
- 17.06.2022 Выставка Люси Вороновой в галерее Atelier CHOUTKO На выставке будут представлены живописные произведения Вороновой разных лет и состоится премьера ковра ручной работы, созданного художницей совместно с Atelier CHOUTKO
- 14.03.2022 Эрмитаж потребовал досрочно вернуть работы, участвующие в итальянских выставках В Россию в ближайшее время вернутся около 25 картин
- 30.07.2020 In Saint-Петербурге opened the exhibition "Artists and collectors — to the Russian Museum. Gifts. 1898-2019. Favorites" The exhibition, held simultaneously on all the main belt, has collected more than 1,500 items donated to the Museum since the founding of the
- 27.07.2020 Fedor Rokotov exhibition opens at Historical Museum of Moscow A collection of works of the famous Russian portrait painter XVIII veka will showcase on 29 July 2020
Top 24
- 1. Jeff Koons$91,07 million
- 2. David Hockney$90,3 million
- 3. Gerhard Richter$46,3 million
- 4. Cui Zhuchzho$39,57 million
- 5. Jasper Johns$36 million
- 6. Ed Ruscha$30,4 million
- 7. Christopher Wool$29,9 million
- 8. Peter Doig$28,81 million
- 9. Frank Stella$28 million
- 10. Yoshitomo Nara$24,95 million
- 11. Zeng Fanzhi$23,3 million
- 12. Robert Ryman$20,6 million
- 13. Damien Hirst$19,2 million
- 14. Maurizio Cattelan$17,19 million
- 15. Mark Grotjahn$16,8 million
- 16. Takashi Murakami$15,16 million
- 17. KAWS$14,7 million
- 18. Jin Shangyi$13,89 million
- 19. Banksy$12,14 million
- 20. John Currin$12 million
- 21. Brice Marden$10,917 million
- 22. Pierre Soulages$10,6 million
- 23. Zhang Xiaogang$10,16 million
- 24. Bruce Nauman$9,9 million
- Нас покидают...
- Guide to photo reports from exhibitions
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель”, серебро, эмаль.
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель” , оклад,эмаль.
- ASSESSMENT ON Internet (Information database for 5000 artists)
- Still Life Flowers Eugene Lang
- Автопортрет художника. 1930-е.г. Атрибуция.
- Положение во гроб Иисуса Христа оценка
- Bronze. E.Lancere.
- collages on the theme of the war in Ukraine