- Нас покидают...
- Guide to photo reports from exhibitions
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель”, серебро, эмаль.
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель” , оклад,эмаль.
- ASSESSMENT ON Internet (Information database for 5000 artists)
- Still Life Flowers Eugene Lang
- Автопортрет художника. 1930-е.г. Атрибуция.
- Положение во гроб Иисуса Христа оценка
- Bronze. E.Lancere.
- collages on the theme of the war in Ukraine
From the Ministry of culture asked for the removal of the picture of Nyssa
ARTinvestment.RU 26 мая 2016
Prosecutors said that the experts accredited by the Ministry of culture, understate the value exported at Sotheby's masterpieces, created conditions for illegal border crossing and allowed other violations
Spun with the fact that "Kommersant" has at its disposal the proposal of the Prosecutor General, which found that the Ministry of culture "turns a blind eye to abuse expert who understate the value of works of art, which leads to a shortfall in taxes on their sales" and "creates the conditions for illegal export of cultural values abroad".
the Insight of all descended after checking, which is initiated, according to Vladimir Medinsky, the Ministry of culture. The essence of claims of Prosecutor's office may be illustrated on one example.
Two years ago, in June 2014 at Sotheby's exhibited paintings masterpiece George of Nyssa "Over the snow" in 1964. The luxurious, Museum-quality thing of enormous size (more one and a half meters). Yes, and the provenance is impeccable — from the collection of the International Confederation of artists unions (the successor of the Union of artists of the USSR). It is not surprising that this work is three times higher than the estimate, almost three million dollars bought the banker Alexey Ananiev, and today, the picture of Nyssa rightly it decorates the Museum IRRI.
Sold. And then who is-то asked a question: "excuse me, but generally a masterpiece from the collection of the Confederation was on the Sotheby's?". Started digging and found (according to "Kommersant") about the following:
1. Work were taken by issuing a permit to itself as a private person, the head of the Confederation of the masut Fatkulin. The Prosecutor's office considered it a violation.
2. The export was allowed on technical grounds that the work at that time was 50 years, but rather, a little less if you took out earlier in 2014. Although he could, of course, to deny, given the outstanding cultural value.
3. To pay 5%-ной duties (that is, if the picture counted 49 years), the experts of the Ministry of culture now valued at 800,000 rubles. Unlike Sotheby's, which estimated it at more than $ 800,000 — is 35 times more expensive.
4. Likely to completely bring trouble to the Russian Ministry of culture, British Sotheby's sold the painting not for 800 000 rubles, and for 102 571 000 — in 128 times more expensive.
as a result, the Prosecutor General's office expressed outrage: "but where were you? Shame you have?". And the Ministry of culture, as in the movie, shrugged: "-за irishki, irishki Korobeynikovo. Violators are already dismissed".
Incidentally, it is strange that the dismissed. It would be interesting to know, for what exactly? For faulty moral character, or what? I think that issuing the permit, the experts were prudent enough not to bring their actions under the article. And fully admit that they acted strictly within the framework of the opportunities offered to them by the law.
And the law today, in fact, allows the experts to do the following:
1. To do the assessment for the calculation of export duties is free, in its sole discretion. Because the value of the work determines the expert accredited by the Ministry of culture, not a professional appraiser. Evaluates practically as you wish. Because a specialist accredited by the Ministry of culture, no need to confirm their assessment of reference of auction sales, to bring the method of valuation to compile a formal report. That is, he doesn't need to do all that is required of a normal professional valuers. Therefore, in some cases, it turns out: I want — 800 000, want — $ 800,000. All is one. And most likely, is not contrary to the law.
2. Do not rely on the Federal standard of cultural values. Because no standard no. Its design was developed in 2015, but vanished in the offices of the Ministry of economic development.
3. To neglect a number of details, including the exact dimensions, materials, technology, title, and authorship in the description of work for which the permit is issued. In theory all this should be in the examination. But it may not be. Because the examination is also no clear requirements, since national standard examination in our country is not developed.
4. Agree on the "n/x", even if not explicitly n/C, but in written examination: n/x.
5. To interpret the age produced works in a wide range. For example, if in the written examination 1910-е years, it's like? If 1918, less than 100 years, and the export can be allowed. But if the year 1915 and you used the object is not imported, then "adieu", because more than 100 years. Well, and to calculate fees — all the same: 49 years — 5 %, and 51 the year — is already 10 %.
This system still works. Although it allows too much subjective. Theoretically, this allows someone-то to overlook the problematic provisions and to interpret them in favour of the applicant of export. However, today more often the opposite — experts of the Ministry of culture reinsured. In particular, assess the items even more expensive than they were bought really. And age put rather at the lower end: if the written examination in 1910-е years, it almost certainly count as 1910-й, not 1917-й.
the Scandal with the export of the masterpieces of foreign trades may entail a number of consequences:
1. Leading international auctions (especially Sotheby's and Christie's) will be "under the hood müller". Lost duty — matter of national importance, so who is-то certainly will start to browse the auction catalogs, pay attention to the estimate and to distinguish 800 thousand from 800 thousand dollars.
2. Control will be enforced at the border with the risk of inconvenience to conscientious owners, with their hands on official documents. Where too increased vigilance, there is a high risk of "excesses" on the ground.
3. Taught by bitter experience, the experts accredited by the Ministry of culture, at the slightest doubt, will tend to overestimate the age and evaluation of works.
4. The scandal dies down, but at the level of all regulations will remain as it was. In particular, the Federal valuation standard and national standard examination taken in the coming years will not. Assessment for the purpose of export will not do the appraisers, and experts. And so you want the market base works, under investigation, did not appear. This opinion.
5. People who had taken things from "optimized" rating, but quite legally, will begin to seek access to informal channels.
all is not so bad. After all, the bad customs such scandals? The bad thing Stepanova? What is bad the Koch? Than a bad case of the same Fatkulina? Yes, the fact that new people just embarking on the path of collecting, looking at all this, think: "is it worth it to connect with Russian art? But if contacted, whether to buy in the country?" It can get really, what else.
There would be the opposite to do to forestall: do not tighten the nut, and to liberalize the import-вывоз to the maximum, increase transparency, clarify the regulations, to give people the opportunity to safely dispose of their property and through it to increase the attractiveness of the internal market art. So people are not afraid to sell and buy here.
Dreaming? Well, not without it, of course.
Sources: kommersant.ru; mkrf.ru; forbes.ru
https://artinvestment.ru/en/invest/law/20160526_minkult.html
https://artinvestment.ru/invest/law/20160526_minkult.html
When quoting reference to the https://artinvestment.ru without fail
Attention! All materials of the site and database of auction results ARTinvestment.RU, including illustrated reference information about the works sold at auctions, are intended for use exclusively for informational, scientific, educational and cultural purposes in accordance with Art. 1274 of the Civil Code. Use for commercial purposes or in violation of the rules established by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is not allowed. ARTinvestment.RU is not responsible for the content of materials submitted by third parties. In case of violation of the rights of third parties, the site administration reserves the right to remove them from the site and from the database on the basis of an application from an authorized body.
- 16.08.2022 Расследование ФБР подрывает репутацию Художественного музея Орландо Отменены три выставки, из собрания отозваны отдельные работы
- 14.08.2020 Face mask for $1.5 million In this sum cost the unnamed "billionaire from Shanghai" ordering a mask of gold and diamonds from the jewelry company Yvel
- 14.08.2020 A special contract for buyers of art of authors of African descent For fight against speculators, Christie's has developed a list of conditions of purchase
- 13.08.2020 Cultural institution in the U.S. last year spent $7.9 billion This year a repeat result is not obtained – loss of art-индустрии the United States already amounted to $150 billion And this is not the final figure
- 13.08.2020 Biography Yayoi Kusama will be released as a graphic novel With the history of one of the most successful contemporary artists in the form of a comic book will be available from 15 September 2020
- 03.08.2018 Торги «Антиквариума» 28 июля. Краткие итоги Наторговали на 3,6 миллиона рублей — 131 % от эстимейта. Одним из топ-лотов стала работа Владимира Немухина, проданная за 240 тысяч
- 25.07.2018 Очередной аукцион #всёпорублю в «Литфонде» принес почти 4,5 млн.руб. Топ-лотом стала икона «Богоматерь Владимирская» — 600 тыс. руб.
- 24.07.2018 «Русская Эмаль» торжественно закрывает сезон и уходит в отпуск На завершающих торгах 14 июля «Русская эмаль» порадовала участников Кандинским, целой коллекцией нэцкэ и произведениями Пыжовой
- 16.07.2018 Краткие итоги сороковых живописных торгов «Кабинета» Аукционный дом «Кабинет» проводит последние торги сезона и уходит в отпуск до осени, вслед за своими игроками
- 03.07.2018 Коротко о главном: итоги аукциона 28 июня в «Литфонде» Рейтинг возглавляют классики русской литературы, а сказочники продолжают удивлять
- 12.08.2020 Literature: Piroska Dossey. Sold! The book is about the phenomenon of pricing, the original title of which was ahead of its time in a decade
- 07.08.2020 Movies: "the Cool school" The emergence of abstract expressionism on the West coast of the United States the voice of the Big Lebowski
- 06.08.2020 Cross-trades in the summer of 2020. ArtTactic Report Analysis of auction sales of a new format with the participation of the old masters
- 04.08.2020 Opened 27-й auction "twenty-first century. Contemporary Russian art" The catalogue contains artworks of Seeds Agroskin, Alexei Vaulin, Dima Goryachkin, Dasha Delone, Anna Laurel, Denis Mikhailov, Andrei Munz, Arman Sirunian, Kathy-Анны Taguchi and Tatiana Yang
- 31.07.2020 10 most unusual ArtTech-стартапов 2020. Part 1 AI talks about young companies whose ideas have become especially popular with the onset of the quarantine
- 07.03.2023 Неизвестный известный Серж Иванов (1893–1983) История происхождения ранних картин С.П.Иванова
- 17.06.2022 Выставка Люси Вороновой в галерее Atelier CHOUTKO На выставке будут представлены живописные произведения Вороновой разных лет и состоится премьера ковра ручной работы, созданного художницей совместно с Atelier CHOUTKO
- 14.03.2022 Эрмитаж потребовал досрочно вернуть работы, участвующие в итальянских выставках В Россию в ближайшее время вернутся около 25 картин
- 30.07.2020 In Saint-Петербурге opened the exhibition "Artists and collectors — to the Russian Museum. Gifts. 1898-2019. Favorites" The exhibition, held simultaneously on all the main belt, has collected more than 1,500 items donated to the Museum since the founding of the
- 27.07.2020 Fedor Rokotov exhibition opens at Historical Museum of Moscow A collection of works of the famous Russian portrait painter XVIII veka will showcase on 29 July 2020
Top 37
- 1. Mark Rothko$86,83 million
- 2. Kazimir Malevich$85,81 million
- 3. Wassily Kandinsky$41,6 million
- 4. Marc Chagall$28,45 million
- 5. Chaim Soutine$28,16 million
- 6. Nicolas Staël$22,25 million
- 7. Alexei Jawlensky$18,59 million
- 8. Valentin Serov$14,51 million
- 9. Tamara de Lempicka$13,36 million
- 10. Nicholas Roerich$12,13 million
- 11. Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin$11,76 million
- 12. Natalia Goncharova$10,88 million
- 13. Nicolai Fechin$10,84 million
- 14. Ilya Repin$7,43 million
- 15. Konstantin Somov$7,33 million
- 16. Ilya Mashkov$7,25 million
- 17. Boris Kustodiev$7,07 million
- 18. Vasily Polenov$6,34 million
- 19. Yuri Annenkov$6,27 million
- 20. Ivan Klyun$6,26 million
- 21. Vasily Vereshchagin$6,15 million
- 22. Zinaida Serebriakova$5,85 million
- 23. Ilya Kabakov$5,83 million
- 24. Alexander Yakovlev$5,56 million
- 25. Konstantin Makovsky$5,47 million
- 26. Wladimir Baranoff-Rossine$5,37 million
- 27. Ivan Aivazovsky$5,34 million
- 28. Vladimir Borovikovsky$5,02 million
- 29. Alexander Rodchenko$4,5 million
- 30. Mikhail Larionov$4,46 million
- 31. Sonia Delaunay$4,34 million
- 32. Mikhail Nesterov$4,30 million
- 33. Vera Rockline$4,04 million
- 34. Mikhail Klodt$4,02 million
- 35. Pavel Kuznetsov$3,97 million
- 36. Alexandr Deineka$3,82 million
- 37. Boris Grigoriev$3,72 million
- Нас покидают...
- Guide to photo reports from exhibitions
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель”, серебро, эмаль.
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель” , оклад,эмаль.
- ASSESSMENT ON Internet (Information database for 5000 artists)
- Still Life Flowers Eugene Lang
- Автопортрет художника. 1930-е.г. Атрибуция.
- Положение во гроб Иисуса Христа оценка
- Bronze. E.Lancere.
- collages on the theme of the war in Ukraine