Горячие темы форума
- Прошу помочь с атрибуцией двух акварелей (вероятно французского художника)
- Е.Греч - «Исаакий»
- М.В.Турецкая, автолитографии
- "Приписывается Коровину" продали за 27 000 евро
- А.Б.Колоколов
- В.Летянин
- Маслов Владимир
- Оценка картины
- Реставрация иконы
- Старинные рисунки (карандаш) АКАДЕМИЯ ХУДОЖЕСТВ, экзамен, зачет
Художник: Шишкин Иван Иванович
История продаж доступна подписчикам
О работе
Год создания
1897
Категория
Живопись
Техника
Холст; масло
Размер, см*
146×90,9
Провенанс
Частная коллекция, Швейцария.
Christie's Geneva, Russian Works of Art, 16 ноября 1994, лот 413.
Собственность из частной коллекции.
Christie's Geneva, Russian Works of Art, 16 ноября 1994, лот 413.
Собственность из частной коллекции.
Примечание
Подпись кириллицей и дата "97" внизу справа.
Выставки:
Императорской Академии художеств в Санкт-Петербурге. Мемориальный выставка И. И. Ендогурова,
И. И. Шишкина, Н. А. Ярошенко, 1899.
Возможно, Москва, Посмертная выставка картин профессора И. И. Шишкина, 1904, № 3.
Литература:
Живописное обозрение, 1899, № 2, стр. 32, илл. гравюра под названием "Сухостой".
Few artists grow from strength to strength in their careers, producing some of their finest work in their final years, but Ivan Shishkin was among this elite group. The scale and grandeur of the landscapes he exhibited in the 1890s is extraordinary, none more so than his famous Korabel'naya roshcha,1898 in The State Russian Museum, St Petersburg (fig 2). The numerous orrespondences in composition and technique between the offered lot and this well-known masterpiece, painted only a year later, make this one of the most important works by Shishkin to have appeared at auction for several years.
A variant of the present work was exhibited in the 1899 Peredvizhniki exhibition, titled Sukhostoi, and is subsequently recorded as being in the collection of the Imperial Academy of Arts. There are some minor but key differences between these two paintings: the figure of the old woman leaning against the fence in the Peredvizhniki work is here replaced by a small fire; the two tree stumps on the left in the Peredvizhniki version are positioned differently, and so is the taller dead tree on the left. It was not at all unusual for Shishkin to repeat, rework and perfect a composition.
Excitingly however, these small variations allows us to state conclusively that the offered lot was the version
reproduced in the journal Zhivopisnoe obozrenie in 1899. Additionally, the journal notes that the present painting was exhibited in the memorial exhibition of three Peredvizhniki artists, Ivan Shishkin, Ivan Endogourov (1861—1898) and Nikolai Yaroshenko (1846-1898) – giants of the genre who all died in the same year. Finally, a painting titled Sukhostoi is also listed as no.3 in Shishkin's retrospective exhibition in Moscow in 1904, curated by V.Chekato; since the catalogue is not illustrated, we cannot presume which version was exhibited but it is entirely possible that it was the present work.
The strong trunks and bright canopies of the forest seem at first to be at odds with Shishkin's original title for the work.
But as so often with Shishkin's landscapes, particularly his later works, the title draws out the several allegorical
elements of the painting. The stump to the left of the central pine is perhaps the starkest juxtaposition of life and decay, echoed elsewhere in the left-hand leafless trees and brushwood, set against the new growth on the forest
floor and sunlit branches above. The track that stretches into the distance is a near-universal reference to the path of a man's life; the threatening clouds and darkness at the end of the track in contrast solemnly with the sunlit clearing of the present.
By this stage of his life Shishkin was so familiar with the idioms of nature that his moods and philosophies become
linked inextricably with the landscapes he painted. The present work shows 'The Bogatyr of the Russian Forest' as he
was called by his contemporaries, painting bogatyr-like pine trees at a time of gradual deterioration. As a statement of optimism and courage from an elderly man, the present work is among the boldest and most moving of Shishkin's career.
These motifs are signature elements of Shishkin's landscapes. The techniques employed in the present work are
equally characteristic: the preparatory drawing, the faktura, the free movement of the brush, his precise manner of conveying light and the palette which is typical of his later works. By the 1890s he had moved away from an obsessive Dürer-like interest in every blade of grass and the ripple of each piece of bark, but his landscapes are no less alive or powerful – if anything, they are more so.
As one contemporary critic put it in 1895, it is difficult to find a more fitting definition for Shishkin than 'A Poet of Nature', 'a poet, who finds beauty where an ordinary man would pass through unmoved and indifferent... The smoke
which drifts through the trunks of the pines in the distance, the bright patches of sky between the trembling branches – all of this speaks to his heart, illuminating the artist and viewer. You see that all of this lives, feels, smoulders and breathes under his brush and pencil' (V.Nemirovich-Danchenko quoted in I.Shuvalova, Ivan Ivanovich Shishkin, 1978, p.291).
We are grateful to Elena Nesterova of The State Russian Museum for providing this catalogue note.
Fig. 1
The offered lot illustrated in Zhivopisnoe obozrenie, 1899
Fig. 2
Mast-Tree Grove, 1898, The State Russian Museum, St. Petersburg
Fig. 3
Pine-Tree Canopies, Study, 1890s, Kirov Fine Art Museum
Fig. 4
A contemporary photograph of Shishkin in a pine forest, late 1880s
?early 1890s
Important Russian Art
London | 26 2012, 06:00 PM |
Выставки:
Императорской Академии художеств в Санкт-Петербурге. Мемориальный выставка И. И. Ендогурова,
И. И. Шишкина, Н. А. Ярошенко, 1899.
Возможно, Москва, Посмертная выставка картин профессора И. И. Шишкина, 1904, № 3.
Литература:
Живописное обозрение, 1899, № 2, стр. 32, илл. гравюра под названием "Сухостой".
Few artists grow from strength to strength in their careers, producing some of their finest work in their final years, but Ivan Shishkin was among this elite group. The scale and grandeur of the landscapes he exhibited in the 1890s is extraordinary, none more so than his famous Korabel'naya roshcha,1898 in The State Russian Museum, St Petersburg (fig 2). The numerous orrespondences in composition and technique between the offered lot and this well-known masterpiece, painted only a year later, make this one of the most important works by Shishkin to have appeared at auction for several years.
A variant of the present work was exhibited in the 1899 Peredvizhniki exhibition, titled Sukhostoi, and is subsequently recorded as being in the collection of the Imperial Academy of Arts. There are some minor but key differences between these two paintings: the figure of the old woman leaning against the fence in the Peredvizhniki work is here replaced by a small fire; the two tree stumps on the left in the Peredvizhniki version are positioned differently, and so is the taller dead tree on the left. It was not at all unusual for Shishkin to repeat, rework and perfect a composition.
Excitingly however, these small variations allows us to state conclusively that the offered lot was the version
reproduced in the journal Zhivopisnoe obozrenie in 1899. Additionally, the journal notes that the present painting was exhibited in the memorial exhibition of three Peredvizhniki artists, Ivan Shishkin, Ivan Endogourov (1861—1898) and Nikolai Yaroshenko (1846-1898) – giants of the genre who all died in the same year. Finally, a painting titled Sukhostoi is also listed as no.3 in Shishkin's retrospective exhibition in Moscow in 1904, curated by V.Chekato; since the catalogue is not illustrated, we cannot presume which version was exhibited but it is entirely possible that it was the present work.
The strong trunks and bright canopies of the forest seem at first to be at odds with Shishkin's original title for the work.
But as so often with Shishkin's landscapes, particularly his later works, the title draws out the several allegorical
elements of the painting. The stump to the left of the central pine is perhaps the starkest juxtaposition of life and decay, echoed elsewhere in the left-hand leafless trees and brushwood, set against the new growth on the forest
floor and sunlit branches above. The track that stretches into the distance is a near-universal reference to the path of a man's life; the threatening clouds and darkness at the end of the track in contrast solemnly with the sunlit clearing of the present.
By this stage of his life Shishkin was so familiar with the idioms of nature that his moods and philosophies become
linked inextricably with the landscapes he painted. The present work shows 'The Bogatyr of the Russian Forest' as he
was called by his contemporaries, painting bogatyr-like pine trees at a time of gradual deterioration. As a statement of optimism and courage from an elderly man, the present work is among the boldest and most moving of Shishkin's career.
These motifs are signature elements of Shishkin's landscapes. The techniques employed in the present work are
equally characteristic: the preparatory drawing, the faktura, the free movement of the brush, his precise manner of conveying light and the palette which is typical of his later works. By the 1890s he had moved away from an obsessive Dürer-like interest in every blade of grass and the ripple of each piece of bark, but his landscapes are no less alive or powerful – if anything, they are more so.
As one contemporary critic put it in 1895, it is difficult to find a more fitting definition for Shishkin than 'A Poet of Nature', 'a poet, who finds beauty where an ordinary man would pass through unmoved and indifferent... The smoke
which drifts through the trunks of the pines in the distance, the bright patches of sky between the trembling branches – all of this speaks to his heart, illuminating the artist and viewer. You see that all of this lives, feels, smoulders and breathes under his brush and pencil' (V.Nemirovich-Danchenko quoted in I.Shuvalova, Ivan Ivanovich Shishkin, 1978, p.291).
We are grateful to Elena Nesterova of The State Russian Museum for providing this catalogue note.
Fig. 1
The offered lot illustrated in Zhivopisnoe obozrenie, 1899
Fig. 2
Mast-Tree Grove, 1898, The State Russian Museum, St. Petersburg
Fig. 3
Pine-Tree Canopies, Study, 1890s, Kirov Fine Art Museum
Fig. 4
A contemporary photograph of Shishkin in a pine forest, late 1880s
?early 1890s
Important Russian Art
London | 26 2012, 06:00 PM |
Внимание! Все материалы сайта и базы данных аукционных результатов ARTinvestment.RU, включая иллюстрированные справочные сведение о проданных на аукционах произведениях, предназначены для использования исключительно в информационных, научных, учебных и культурных целях в соответствии со ст. 1274 ГК РФ. Использование в коммерческих целях или с нарушением правил, установленных ГК РФ, не допускается. ARTinvestment.RU не отвечает за содержание материалов, представленных третьими лицами. В случае нарушения прав третьих лиц, администрация сайта оставляет за собой право удалить их с сайта и из базы данных на основании обращения уполномоченного органа.
- 18.04.2024 Центр «Зотов» объявил прием заявок на участие в грантовой программе для исследователей конструктивизма Общий грантовый фонд составил 1,2 млн рублей
- 18.04.2024 Artnet анализирует рынок работ Виллема де Кунинга Поздние произведения художника в последние годы начали расти в цене
- 16.04.2024 Готовится каталог-резоне NFT-работ из проекта Сryptopunks В нем соберут репродукции всех работ коллекции, выпущенных с 2017 года
- 12.04.2024 Закрылась торговавшая NFT платформа Digital Basel Целый год обвинений в мошенничестве не прошел даром
- 12.04.2024 Ключевые драйверы, определяющие вектор развития арт-рынка Азии По версии Artsy, ими являются арт-ярмарки Дели, Гонконга, Токио и Сеула
- 17.04.2024 Редкий розовый бриллиант выставили на торги Phillips Предварительная оценка раритета составляет $15 млн
- 15.04.2024 Christie’s выставил на продажу редкую вещь Баскии Предварительно работа оценивается в $30 млн
- 12.04.2024 Итоги аукциона ARTinvestment.RU № 525 Общая выручка составила 12,2 млн рублей
- 05.04.2024 Итоги AI Аукциона № 524 Общая выручка составила 14,3 млн рублей
- 05.04.2024 За £25 млн на Christie’s выставили картину Тициана Работа в свое время была похищена наполеоновскими войсками
- 05.04.2024 Отчет Art Basel & UBS 2024: онлайн-продажи AI изучает официальные показатели онлайн-продаж искусства в 2023 году
- 02.04.2024 Коллекционеры и коллекционирование. Статус Третий материал серии, посвященной теории и практике современного коллекционирования предметов искусства
- 01.04.2024 Открыт 207-й аукцион «21-й век. Современное российское искусство» В каталоге — совместные работы Лилии Ли-ми-ян и Катерины Садовски
- 01.04.2024 Открыты 524-е торги AI Аукциона В каталоге 26 лотов: 13 живописных работ, 5 листов оригинальной и два — печатной графики, две работы в смешанной технике, две скульптуры, одна фарфоровая тарелка и одна икона
- 29.03.2024 Арт-кинозал: «Искусство по понятиям» AI разбирает художественные и документальные фильмы, частично или полностью посвященные рынку искусства
- 17.04.2024 В Пушкинском музее открылись обновленные залы французского искусства Посетители впервые после длительной реставрации увидят работу Никола Пуссена «Сатир и нимфа»
- 16.04.2024 21-я ярмарка «Арт Москва» откроется в Гостином дворе 17 апреля В смотре примут участие 250 галерей, институций и брендов
- 15.04.2024 Художник Дарья Русских представит свой стенд на ярмарке «Арт Москва» Среди работ будут представлены принты, сгенерированные совместно с искусственным интеллектом
- 15.04.2024 В МАММ открылась выставка Эрика Булатова «Живу дальше. Лаборатория художника» В экспозицию вошли более 100 работ
- 11.04.2024 В Москве открывается второй выпуск ярмарки |catalog| В смотре примет участие более 50 галерей
Индексы арт-рынка ARTIMX
Индекс
Дата
Знач.
Изм.
ARTIMX
13/07
1502.83
+4,31%
ARTIMX-RUS
13/07
1502.83
+4,31%
Показать:
Топ 37
- 1. Марк Ротко$86,83 млн
- 2. Казимир Малевич$85,81 млн
- 3. Василий Кандинский$41,8 млн
- 4. Марк Шагал$28,45 млн
- 5. Хаим Сутин$28,16 млн
- 6. Николя де Сталь$22,2 млн
- 7. Алексей Явленский$18,59 млн
- 8. Валентин Серов$14,51 млн
- 9. Тамара де Лемпицка$13,36 млн
- 10. Николай Рерих$12,09 млн
- 11. Кузьма Сергеевич Петров-Водкин$11,76 млн
- 12. Наталия Гончарова$10,88 млн
- 13. Николай Фешин$10,84 млн
- 14. Илья Репин$7,43 млн
- 15. Константин Сомов$7,33 млн
- 16. Илья Машков$7,25 млн
- 17. Борис Кустодиев$7,07 млн
- 18. Василий Поленов$6,34 млн
- 19. Юрий Анненков$6,27 млн
- 20. Иван Васильевич Клюн$6,26 млн
- 21. Василий Верещагин$6,15 млн
- 22. Зинаида Серебрякова$5,85 млн
- 23. Илья Кабаков$5,83 млн
- 24. Александр Яковлев$5,56 млн
- 25. Константин Маковский$5,47 млн
- 26. Владимир Баранов-Россине$5,37 млн
- 27. Иван Айвазовский$5,34 млн
- 28. Владимир Боровиковский$5,02 млн
- 29. Александр Родченко$4,5 млн
- 30. Михаил Ларионов$4,46 млн
- 31. Соня Делоне$4,34 млн
- 32. Михаил Нестеров$4,30 млн
- 33. Вера Рохлина$4,04 млн
- 34. Михаил Клодт$4,02 млн
- 35. Павел Кузнецов$3,97 млн
- 36. Александр Дейнека$3,82 млн
- 37. Борис Григорьев$3,72 млн
Горячие темы форума
- Прошу помочь с атрибуцией двух акварелей (вероятно французского художника)
- Е.Греч - «Исаакий»
- М.В.Турецкая, автолитографии
- "Приписывается Коровину" продали за 27 000 евро
- А.Б.Колоколов
- В.Летянин
- Маслов Владимир
- Оценка картины
- Реставрация иконы
- Старинные рисунки (карандаш) АКАДЕМИЯ ХУДОЖЕСТВ, экзамен, зачет