- Нас покидают...
- Guide to photo reports from exhibitions
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель”, серебро, эмаль.
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель” , оклад,эмаль.
- ASSESSMENT ON Internet (Information database for 5000 artists)
- Still Life Flowers Eugene Lang
- Автопортрет художника. 1930-е.г. Атрибуция.
- Положение во гроб Иисуса Христа оценка
- Bronze. E.Lancere.
- collages on the theme of the war in Ukraine
Cemeynye values: general and personal
ARTinvestment.RU 15 июля 2008
Need to share the common property the family, as well as officially out of the total mass of the personal property of each spouse is not only in a divorce. At ARTinvestment.RU published another story rubric «Act for collector»
Need to split the total family assets, as well as formally distinguished from the general mass of property belonging only to the husband or wife (personal property of each spouse), occurs not only in a divorce. To prove their ownership of these or other things people have to, in cases where one spouse is illegally disposed of at their discretion, without obtaining the consent, approval of the second half. For example, in anticipation of the imminent divorce, saving the most precious and valuable, one of the spouses «presents» collection of paintings to trusted individuals - family, friends, their children (including children from previous marriage). Alternatively, creditors are owed large sums in secret from the other spouse sells, transfers the pledged a gift to them jewelry or separate household collection of rare books. Sometimes a valuable private collection of one spouse is out of ignorance or under the influence of deception, delusion is changing at a cheap thing, forgery ...
In such situations, the aggrieved party may try to return the thing or at least get a decent compensation. But before contrive litigation, it is necessary to clearly determine who actually owned the thing, vybyvshie from the collection.
Let's assume that your other half has committed to a deal with his own personal property, for example with the same engravings or painting, which she acquired before marriage or received as a gift or by inheritance. In this case, your claims to the property the court is likely recognized to be unfounded, especially if the marriage contract is missing or does not regulate the particular transactions in such property and if the person can prove that the property does not belong to you. Evidence may be documents - дарственная with videtelstvo the right to inheritance, the contract of sale, payment instruments, as well as the testimony of witnesses.
But if you put your own (for example, acquired before marriage, proceeds from the sale received by inheritance dachas) or general (family) means, in the restoration of the prints or to pay the salary for the manufacture of precious icons, the cost of these items increased , so you can ask the court to determine the size of the share of each spouse to the property. If the court will satisfy your request and determine your share, you can seek dissolution of the transaction.
If the transaction is in respect of common property taken without your consent, to recognize it as invalid have to go to court. Recall the joint ownership regime applies to property acquired by spouses during marriage as through their individual income 1 , and from general revenue. If due to such proceeds bought jewelry 2 and other luxury items 3 , then these things relate to the composition of the common property even when one spouse acquires them, then gives the second half.
gain recognition as invalid the transaction, done on a common property of spouses is difficult. Article 35 of the Family Code, although it states that the disposal of common property is carried out by mutual agreement of the spouses, but it also specifies that when one spouse transactions on the order of common property, it is assumed that it is acting with the consent of the other spouse.
Nevertheless, the possibility for the recognition of a court there is an invalid transaction. To this end, the husband, without whose consent was committed transaction, must apply to the court with an application for its dissolution. The plaintiff must prove to the court that his consent to the transaction was not and that the new owner of the thing (person, kupivshee it has received as a gift, to the pledge) knew or certainly should have known of the plaintiff's opposition to the trade. Please note: «aware of the opposition», rather than the absence of consent, ie, the plaintiff need to try to prove that, for example, a buyer of vintage items from the family collection was acting in bad faith, knowing that one spouse was against such a sale. If the sale was carried out, for example, through the shop, it is impossible to prove this fact. But if the thing has become, for example, someone from a collector friend, who was perfectly aware that the «thing not for sale», then the court could invite witnesses to confirm that in the presence of the collector of the buyer (possibly more than once) refused sell an item collection, that the collector had other plans on the order of assembly, the individual items from it, etc. Then the court may take note of evidence such as personal correspondence, documents, clearly indicating the intention of the spouse to convey a collection donated by a third person, testamentary disposition, the consent to give the thing to display at a future show, etc.
If a claim for recognition of transactions ordered by the joint property as invalid is granted, in accordance with the Civil Code is considered that this transaction is invalid from the moment of its commission and each party shall return to the other side of whatever is received in the transaction. And if a citizen or organization, obtain the your thing, sells, gives it, otherwise the transaction, they are also null and void, because unauthorized person committed. And if a thing is impossible to return, its price must be paid in money.
If it sold, a gift set of your second half belonged to the law of personal property for you, it also should be able to prove it. If you succeed, then the search for rules that protect your rights as an owner, you will no longer in the Family Code and the Civil.
Elena Pokidova, Attorney
Source: ARTinvestment.RU
1 Revenue ton of labor, business and intellectual property, pensions, allowances and other Return
2 The objects of gold, jewelry made of precious and semiprecious metals and stones. Return
3 valuables, works of art, antiques and unique items, collections and other things that are not required to meet the immediate needs of family members . Return
https://artinvestment.ru/en/invest/law/20080715_family_values.html
https://artinvestment.ru/invest/law/20080715_family_values.html
When quoting reference to the https://artinvestment.ru without fail
Attention! All materials of the site and database of auction results ARTinvestment.RU, including illustrated reference information about the works sold at auctions, are intended for use exclusively for informational, scientific, educational and cultural purposes in accordance with Art. 1274 of the Civil Code. Use for commercial purposes or in violation of the rules established by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is not allowed. ARTinvestment.RU is not responsible for the content of materials submitted by third parties. In case of violation of the rights of third parties, the site administration reserves the right to remove them from the site and from the database on the basis of an application from an authorized body.
- 16.08.2022 Расследование ФБР подрывает репутацию Художественного музея Орландо Отменены три выставки, из собрания отозваны отдельные работы
- 14.08.2020 Face mask for $1.5 million In this sum cost the unnamed "billionaire from Shanghai" ordering a mask of gold and diamonds from the jewelry company Yvel
- 14.08.2020 A special contract for buyers of art of authors of African descent For fight against speculators, Christie's has developed a list of conditions of purchase
- 13.08.2020 Cultural institution in the U.S. last year spent $7.9 billion This year a repeat result is not obtained – loss of art-индустрии the United States already amounted to $150 billion And this is not the final figure
- 13.08.2020 Biography Yayoi Kusama will be released as a graphic novel With the history of one of the most successful contemporary artists in the form of a comic book will be available from 15 September 2020
- 03.08.2018 Торги «Антиквариума» 28 июля. Краткие итоги Наторговали на 3,6 миллиона рублей — 131 % от эстимейта. Одним из топ-лотов стала работа Владимира Немухина, проданная за 240 тысяч
- 25.07.2018 Очередной аукцион #всёпорублю в «Литфонде» принес почти 4,5 млн.руб. Топ-лотом стала икона «Богоматерь Владимирская» — 600 тыс. руб.
- 24.07.2018 «Русская Эмаль» торжественно закрывает сезон и уходит в отпуск На завершающих торгах 14 июля «Русская эмаль» порадовала участников Кандинским, целой коллекцией нэцкэ и произведениями Пыжовой
- 16.07.2018 Краткие итоги сороковых живописных торгов «Кабинета» Аукционный дом «Кабинет» проводит последние торги сезона и уходит в отпуск до осени, вслед за своими игроками
- 03.07.2018 Коротко о главном: итоги аукциона 28 июня в «Литфонде» Рейтинг возглавляют классики русской литературы, а сказочники продолжают удивлять
- 12.08.2020 Literature: Piroska Dossey. Sold! The book is about the phenomenon of pricing, the original title of which was ahead of its time in a decade
- 07.08.2020 Movies: "the Cool school" The emergence of abstract expressionism on the West coast of the United States the voice of the Big Lebowski
- 06.08.2020 Cross-trades in the summer of 2020. ArtTactic Report Analysis of auction sales of a new format with the participation of the old masters
- 04.08.2020 Opened 27-й auction "twenty-first century. Contemporary Russian art" The catalogue contains artworks of Seeds Agroskin, Alexei Vaulin, Dima Goryachkin, Dasha Delone, Anna Laurel, Denis Mikhailov, Andrei Munz, Arman Sirunian, Kathy-Анны Taguchi and Tatiana Yang
- 31.07.2020 10 most unusual ArtTech-стартапов 2020. Part 1 AI talks about young companies whose ideas have become especially popular with the onset of the quarantine
- 07.03.2023 Неизвестный известный Серж Иванов (1893–1983) История происхождения ранних картин С.П.Иванова
- 17.06.2022 Выставка Люси Вороновой в галерее Atelier CHOUTKO На выставке будут представлены живописные произведения Вороновой разных лет и состоится премьера ковра ручной работы, созданного художницей совместно с Atelier CHOUTKO
- 14.03.2022 Эрмитаж потребовал досрочно вернуть работы, участвующие в итальянских выставках В Россию в ближайшее время вернутся около 25 картин
- 30.07.2020 In Saint-Петербурге opened the exhibition "Artists and collectors — to the Russian Museum. Gifts. 1898-2019. Favorites" The exhibition, held simultaneously on all the main belt, has collected more than 1,500 items donated to the Museum since the founding of the
- 27.07.2020 Fedor Rokotov exhibition opens at Historical Museum of Moscow A collection of works of the famous Russian portrait painter XVIII veka will showcase on 29 July 2020
Top 37
- 1. Mark Rothko$86,83 million
- 2. Kazimir Malevich$85,81 million
- 3. Wassily Kandinsky$41,6 million
- 4. Marc Chagall$28,45 million
- 5. Chaim Soutine$28,16 million
- 6. Nicolas Staël$22,25 million
- 7. Alexei Jawlensky$18,59 million
- 8. Valentin Serov$14,51 million
- 9. Tamara de Lempicka$13,36 million
- 10. Nicholas Roerich$12,13 million
- 11. Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin$11,76 million
- 12. Natalia Goncharova$10,88 million
- 13. Nicolai Fechin$10,84 million
- 14. Ilya Repin$7,43 million
- 15. Konstantin Somov$7,33 million
- 16. Ilya Mashkov$7,25 million
- 17. Boris Kustodiev$7,07 million
- 18. Vasily Polenov$6,34 million
- 19. Yuri Annenkov$6,27 million
- 20. Ivan Klyun$6,26 million
- 21. Vasily Vereshchagin$6,15 million
- 22. Zinaida Serebriakova$5,85 million
- 23. Ilya Kabakov$5,83 million
- 24. Alexander Yakovlev$5,56 million
- 25. Konstantin Makovsky$5,47 million
- 26. Wladimir Baranoff-Rossine$5,37 million
- 27. Ivan Aivazovsky$5,34 million
- 28. Vladimir Borovikovsky$5,02 million
- 29. Alexander Rodchenko$4,5 million
- 30. Mikhail Larionov$4,46 million
- 31. Sonia Delaunay$4,34 million
- 32. Mikhail Nesterov$4,30 million
- 33. Vera Rockline$4,04 million
- 34. Mikhail Klodt$4,02 million
- 35. Pavel Kuznetsov$3,97 million
- 36. Alexandr Deineka$3,82 million
- 37. Boris Grigoriev$3,72 million
- Нас покидают...
- Guide to photo reports from exhibitions
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель”, серебро, эмаль.
- Икона “Господь Вседержитель” , оклад,эмаль.
- ASSESSMENT ON Internet (Information database for 5000 artists)
- Still Life Flowers Eugene Lang
- Автопортрет художника. 1930-е.г. Атрибуция.
- Положение во гроб Иисуса Христа оценка
- Bronze. E.Lancere.
- collages on the theme of the war in Ukraine